Skip to main content

Feeding healthy food to hungry children: The Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010

This is an advocacy post so I wont make it too long. I will just provide you with the basics and the links to explore more. But this one is an easy one. Really. Healthier food for kids???!!! We have to advocate for this???? Seems we do!!

About the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 - as benign a political decision as can be but in today's political climate there are no guarantees. There are forces working to block the passage of the bill in Congress even though tens of thousands of parents and organizations have lobbied to get this bill passed. The House of Representatives wants the USDA to start from scratch because they don't like a few things. You check out the details using the links I have provided here and decide for yourself.

Last year, the Senate unanimously passed the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act (HHFKA), requiring USDA to update school nutrition standards. Once these new proposed school nutrition guidelines are implemented, our nation's school children will have access to healthier meals that include more fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and low fat milk; less sodium, unhealthy fats, and calories; and better accountability and compliance with the standards. The legislation authorizes funding and sets policy for all the USDA's core child nutrition program including the National School Lunch Program, the School Breakfast Program, Women, Infants and Children (WIC) among others.

The US Department of Agriculture has revised their school food standards to make the foods more healthy for children who get lunches and breakfasts at school. The new guidelines reduce unhealthy fats, calories and salt, and include low-fat milk and more fruits, vegetables, whole grains and represents the first time in 30 years that there has been a chance to make some changes that will reduce the health risks (associated with obesity, and high fat or salt intake) of the foods children now get served at school.

It seems that there are certain commercial interests who actually want to fight against these changes despite Michele Obama's Let's Move program that has a goal of reducing childhood obesity.

My sister runs a charter school and to provide healthy lunches for her children she has opted out of the federal lunch and breakfast programs and spends an extra 60 cents/meal (than the USDA option) to provide healthy food for the children at her school, Newark Legacy Charter School, in Newark, NJ - a place with what are called food deserts i.e. it's hard to find fresh fruits and vegetables. She works with a company called Revolution Foods to provide these meals. They have a philosophy that keeps sugar and bad fats out of kids meals and keep it on the fresh side. But it costs more than what the USDA programs cost but healthy kids in places that are not only often in places that are hard to find fruits and vegetables but parents don't have the money to afford them and so school is where the kids often get their primary meal.

It just takes a click on the congress and rep links above to find your legislator and make your opinion known. Now get to it!!

For more on childhood obesity: Healthier Generation

Hey hey ho ho!! This processed fat, salty, high calorie lunch has got to go!:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Good intentions, exploitation and studying 'the poor'

I am an academic and thus I am required to do research and to write. As someone who studied sociology, social welfare, public health, international health, and economics I am plenty equipped to study poverty and the lives of poor people. And in my areas of study, these are the people of whom we ask questions, whether here or abroad.Were I to do a search of any library database using poverty as a keyword, I will get hundreds of hits for journal articles published in the past month alone. But I have decided that I will no longer study 'poverty' or 'the poor' because I find it exploitative in its convenience, somewhat useless in its findings and creates a conundrum in its recommendations: how to change poverty by changing the poor. We study how the poor shop, what they eat, what they drink, how fat they are, how (un)educated they are, how much health care they (don't) get, how they parent, and how a wide range of social, political and economic factors interact to inf

Family Planning Summit and the Voice of Poor Women

I decided to edit this piece to start with a video of Melinda Gates talking about her privilege to travel the world and meet women whose voices are not heard on the world stage and so she feels it is her obligation to speak on behalf of them. This gets at the heart of why I wrote this piece so I will let her speak in her own words before I speak mine in response: Melinda Gates interview on her work as family planning advocate I work in the development industry. Sometimes. I have worked in the family planning sector a long time. I have worked in safe motherhood a long time. And I have worked in AIDS. (That these are not integrated in the development sector is a topic for another post). I came to development through childhood experiences with development workers whose ideas were formed in some office far, far away using the most recent data and information on my Jamaican community. They were talented, mulitlingual and well-intentioned. But something about the experience left an ind

Humpty Dumpty, straight marriage and what gay people are thinking

Can all the kings horses and all the kings men and civil union policies and the Defence of Marriage Act and lots more legally entangled people put marriage back together again? I dont think so but let's entertain the thought. Today I am really asking the question: What does marriage equality mean? And though you may not find the answer below, that's where my mind started. First some disclaimers: 1. If you're looking for an advocacy piece on gay marriage this is not it but you will get the point at the end if you're patient enough to read through my why I think marriage is.... well.... I'm not really sure. 2. I am not a believer in the institution of marriage because its balance of power is not in a woman's favor. Gay marriage presents a whole other set of factors which I may explore on another day. 3. I have no idea what gay people are thinking but it gets attention in the title. 4. Who knows? I may lose my mind over someone and..... well.... my mind cannot im