Skip to main content

Preventing the health hazards of adolescent sex: Condoms, sex ed, and the HPV vaccine

Today, the topic of the day is HPV. I'll start with the facts, get them out of the way and get on with the rant.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, HPV is the most common sexually transmitted disease in the USA with more than 50% of all sexually active people getting the virus at some time in their lives. Almost all cervical cancer is linked to HPV. Most of the time HPV goes away by itself within 2 years and does NOT cause health problems. Some strains of HPV cause cancer if they remain in the body for a long time and there is presently no way of knowing which people will develop cancer or other health problems. All women are at risk of cervical cancer and most cervical cancers occur after age 30. The National Cancer Institute estimates that in 2011, 12, 710 women will get cervical cancer and 4,290 will die of the disease. This works out to 8.1 cases and 2.4 deaths per 100,000 women per year - a fairly rare illness in the USA (but much more common and deadly in the economically developing world).

I have no qualms against preventing deaths and illness but the risk of cervical cancer is very low as is the risk of death from the disease. So we are immunizing a generation for a rare illness that already has a way of prevention (Yes. Condoms don't prevent 100% but neither does the vaccine). The HPV vaccine, with Gardasil (sold by Merck) being the most popular, has been widely marketed as a way of preventing cervical cancer by immunizing against four forms of HPV that cause the disease (as well as genital warts and vaginal cancer). Recommended age range for immunization is ages 9-26.

I have based much of a career on the belief that sex should be a safe and pleasurable activity that occurs between consensual partners. It shouldn't cost us our lives or our fertility or our social status.

But the politics of sex is why I have slowly gotten out of the sex business.

And nowhere is the politics of sex more volatile than in adolescence. (Well, the AIDS business has become less politicized but still a pit of snakes).

I get it. This is a country of prudes. People who like their sex on the sly instead of out in the open. (Thus the ever constant stream of 'scandals' that are just normal sexual behavior but conducted by famous people).

So when the chance to 'prevent cervical cancer' came along in the form of an injection, the pharmas (Merck in particular) were more than happy to talk about the prevention of HPV - a sexually transmitted disease - as a way to prevent cervical cancer. But not much talk of sex even though the early age of immunization - 11 - was closely tied to making sure a girl (and now boys) get their shot before they are exposed to HPV - through sex. (Age 11 is when many medical practitioners recommend it but on the website Gardasil is recommended for children as young as age 9).

So let's get this straight...... It is not okay to talk sexual health to children at age 11. We would not dare give children a condom at age 11, without societal outrage. However it is ok to give them an immunization at age 11 that prevents an STD (before sexual intercourse exposes them to HPV)

Call me paranoid but the safety record of drugs related to my reproductive parts is not the greatest and as these immunizations have not been around for 70+ years (the average length of time the children getting it now will live), perhaps we should use the opportunity (if you still want to be part of the medical experiment) to pass on some information while giving the shot. If we are going to give a shot related to a disease acquired through sexual behaviors then just maybe we could give a little spiel on behaviors that promote sexual health; like abstinence (yes, every sex ed volunteer preaches abstinence, not just religiously conservative ones), sexual pleasure from behaviors that do not require intercourse such as sexting (and whatever happened to hand jobs?), the use of a condom and monogamy (the holy grail of sexual relationships).

The focus on preventing cervical cancer and not a STD is really excellent marketing!!! In fact, it seems noone really wants to talk about the sexual behavior of adolescents. It appears that sooner or later we'll just give shots against gonnorhea, syphillis, chlamydia, and the lot, to spare us the necessary conversations or the necessary healthy behaviors. (Sorta like the stuff that makes you able to eat fat without it making you fat).

Abdicating a conversation for an immunization shows how far this country will go to avoid necessary conversations about sexual behavior. When I taught my 10 year old about condoms, everyone thought it was too young and yet they could not understand why I would not give her the HPV vaccine. Huh??? Isn't my condom talk and the immunization both based on the assumption that she may soon have sexual intercourse? When mothers told me that they do not want to imagine their daughter's having sex so they would not talk to them about sex and then packed them off for their Gardasil shot, my brain got a little fuzzy on the logic.

The shot separates us from the reality of adolescent sex. I live in a state (Washington) where the law says there should be comprehensive sexual education for young people. (But Washington has ex-state attorney and current senator who want to legalize marijuana and we have 2 female senators and 1 female governor - all democrats so it's not exactly the USA:). I find it interesting that elementary school children can learn about their stomachs when they learn about digestion but all the parts just below the stomach get ignored. As if they aren't there.

Here's the deal: almost everyone will have sex sooner or later. Let's acknowledge that, teach everyone how the sexual and reproductive health organs work (even married people need to know this), teach them how to take care of them and protect them and let's see how much the sexually transmitted disease rates would drop, unplanned pregnancy rates would drops (married people have this problem too), infertility would drop (often caused by undiagnosed STDs) and hey, even the abortion rate (lots of married people have these) would drop. And isn't that what everyone wants? (Yes. Lefties don't like abortions either).

So is it too much to ask that before the 11-year old gets the HPV vaccine, they get a sexual health class and some condoms, sign a form that says they understand what the immunization is for and that they received the class and the condoms, and then get their stab in the arm. Now that would be public health done the 'right' way instead of the 'easy' way.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Free Speech, Safe Spaces and Academic Freedom

Fall is here and students are back in the classroom and free speech is back on the agenda.

Just a few weeks in and already the hottest topic on campuses across America is free speech. In particular, my alma mater - the University of California, Berkeley (UCBerkeley) - is at the heart of the controversy to bring 'conservative' speakers to campus in what is being billed as Free Speech Week. It can either be seen as ironic, or a full circle revisit, that UC Berkeley is in this place, given its role in creating the free speech movement which grew out of a series of protests during the 1964-1965 academic year. It is now focused on right-wing ideas while back then it was focused on the protest speech of the left. It was as a place for radical ideas that I got to know most about UC Berkeley as a young girl growing up in Jamaica, and one of the primary reasons I chose to attend. The flood of articles that focus on the issue of free speech in the academy almost seems reminiscent of the…

Mass Murder, Civil Rights and Constitutional Amendments

The right to keep and bear arms was given to the people of the United States to keep them safe. It is enshrined in the Bill of Rights (click here for a copy of the Bill of Rights)


It states, "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
I'm all for the rights of the people. But I also know that historical documents have 'context' that apply to a particular time and place. Yes, the constitution was once about men and not about women. About whites and not about blacks nor the people that were here when the white folks came.
And though I think men shooting at rocks and whatnot in the bush or at the range is men being men (and some women being women), i dont get the need for an assault rifle when we are not living in the DRC or are a mercenary on a secret op for Shell or some other Fortune 100. 

I even love reading Soldier of Fortune magazine and watching Sons of Guns on D…

Cuba and Castro: Liberation, Oppression and Socialist Ideals

It's been two years since I have written a post because I write when I have something I need to say and not to keep the blog gods happy. So today, I decided to comment on the death of Fidel Castro from a policy perspective. 

Why Comment
I am inspired to write on Cuba and Castro because as a young Jamaican girl on the island during the 1970's, Castro had a featuring role. In many ways he was the reason my parents left Jamaica. During the worldwide recession due to the oil crisis in the 1970's, Jamaica was led by Michael Manley - a friend to Castro who loved democracy but wanted the social gains of Cuba. Cuban doctors came to Jamaica. Cubans built schools including Jose Martí Technical High School in Spanish Town. Manley nationalized hotels and my family could afford a nice holiday at a hotel for the first time. Prior to that, tourism catered to whites from abroad, not the brown people of the island. 

Manley also nationalized other industries and promoted education with a liber…